[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

/math/ - Mathematics


Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
Instructions:
  • Press the Get Captcha button to get a new captcha
  • Find the correct answer and type the key in TYPE CAPTCHA HERE
  • Press the Publish button to make a post
  • Incorrect answer to the captcha will result in an immediate ban.
File
Password (For file deletion.)

25 Dec 2021Mathchan is launched into public


File: unknown.png ( 2.62 MB , 2048x2048 , 1650489546718.png )

Image
What the fuck is a Polynomial and how do I solve one?
8 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>163
I once knew how to solve polynomials but nowadays anything above degree 2 polynomials is too difficult to me
>>
>>479
Me too, I solve 2-degree equation like this:
x2+ax+b=0x=p+iq x^2+ax+b=0\\ x=p+iq

where
i2=1i^2=-1

(p+iq)2+a(p+iq)+b=0{p2q2+ap+b=02iqp+aiq=0{q=±a24+aa2+bp=a2 \\(p+iq)^2+a(p+iq)+b=0\\ \begin{cases} p^2-q^2+ap+b=0\\ 2iqp+aiq=0 \end{cases} \\ \begin{cases} q=\pm \sqrt{\frac{a^2}{4}+a\frac{a}{2}+b} \\p=-\frac{a}{2} \end{cases}

because i don't remember formula.
>>
waow
>>
>>163
A poly is the sum of plus mono, until quartic eq. there are the formulas; from 5-degree eq. on... there is a general process, that is still secret
>>
>>682
Test


File: IMG_0620.png ( 121.51 KB , 1920x1840 , 1710510012263.png )

Image
Hey dudes, can you help me? I would like to reprove Alan Sokal's theorem in another way, I know how to calculate the roots of a chromatic polynomial, but there is a piece missing from my puzzle: how is n-degree a chromatic polynomial calculated?
Pic's chromatic polynomial has degree 10 but it has three obviusly roots: 0,1,2; and it is not hard to calculate septic eq.


File: RDT_20240229_1723447759617072721404412.jpg ( 68.52 KB , 637x454 , 1709307938793.jpg )

Image
What do you guys think about competitive national exams like CSAT, Gaokao, JEE and more?


File: 62f2b3b7b7b09276a4ad01f2_Unit Circle Degrees.gif ( 58.82 KB , 1024x1024 , 1680066461904.gif )

Image
what's the most important trig concept you remember?
5 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>366
That the squares of sine and cosine sum to 1. Or rather that R[sin,cos] is but R[x,y]/(1-x^2-y^2).
>>
>>623
True, because that equation creates the whole unit circle.

>>367
Moduloing by m partitions the number line into m partitions. 6, being 1m + 1, is equivalent to 11 because it's 2m + 1. Your number of cycles would be the multiplier of m.
>>

File: aed06f9a626ed4a0dfa92e186c44f458.png ( 1.58 MB , 868x1228 , 1705903015096.png )

Image
>>366
Writing sin and cos in terms of exponentials has served me quite well in complex analysis lol :)
>>
>>624
Well, but actually 11 is in base 5 and not in base 10 in fact you wrote 6 in base 10, being 1m+1 that have an extra turn that it is not counted, why?
>>
>>366
pythagoras


File: download.png ( 2.77 KB , 220x220 , 1643169739562.png )

Image
What the hell is a quotient group and why should i care? it's just a bunch of cosets
5 posts omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>118
You'll need it to understand algebraic topology
>>

File: 824ae33f726460269660f8be88357bcc.jpg ( 222.61 KB , 873x1225 , 1706912919666.jpg )

Image
>>124
>Quotients are essential tools for investigating algebraic structures. If you want to understand algebra, master this. Once you do you get the First Isomorphism Theorem which is used in countless proofs
Yeah, you use quotient groups and the FIT to construct algebraic structures out of existing ones. For example, the quotient ring R[x] / (x^2 + 1) is the complex numbers.
>>
More generally speaking, the idea of quotients in mathematics reaches far beyond its specific application in group theory. A quotient is a new structure built out of an existing structure by declaring certain elements of the old structure equivalent to each other.

The first time in mathematics you probably saw a quotient was when you learned about equivalent fractions. We can define addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division on numerator-denominator pairs, but that structure isn't very interesting or useful in itself, nor do the arithmetic operations have the nice properties we expect of them. Only after taking the quotient by declaring certain numerator-denominator pairs equivalent do we get the nice and useful field of fractions.

In order to make a quotient, you need:
- some type of mathematical object
- an equivalence relation on those objects (reflexive, symmetric, and transitive)
- strictly speaking optionally, but this is what makes the quotient useful: some operations on the type of object that respect the equivalence relation
(For example, if a/b and c/d are equivalent fractions, then a/b - e/f is equivalent to c/d - e/f, and similarly e/f - a/b is equivalent to e/f - c/d; thus subtraction respects the equivalence relation.)

There are several ways to construct a quotient:
- Elements of the quotient can be taken to be the equivalence classes of elements of the original structure. This is the most common method. In the example of quotient groups, cosets are the equivalence classes.
- You can choose a representative element from each equivalence class (for example, reduced fractions).
- You can assume that quotient types exist and assume rules about how quotient types work, as is done in the Lean proof assistant.

Quotients are ubiquitous in mathematics, even in constructing basic stuff like naturals -> integers -> rational numbers -> complex numbers. We just mentioned rational numbers, which are presented as a quotient even to schoolchildren. Someone already mentioned how we can construct the complex numbers from real polynomials in a variable called i by setting i^2 = -1. Integers may be constructed from pairs of natural numbers in a manner very similar to the construction of the rationals. The common Cauchy-sequence construction of the reals starts with a subset of sequences of rational numbers, then takes sequences to be equivalent if their difference approaches zero.Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Exercise for the reader: Show that an equivalence relation ~ on the elements of a group is respected by the group operation (meaning a~b and c~d implies ac~bd) if and only if its equivalence classes are the cosets of a normal subgroup.
>>
>>652
This shows that the variety (in the universal algebraic sense) of groups is what's called ideal determined.


File: function.png ( 258.48 KB , 512x512 , 1701966361868.png )

Image
Why are so few people interested in looking for nice function plots? It's like magic, a small formula of the x and y coordinate can make such a complex and beautiful picture. Can we start looking for such nice functions here? Use whatever tool you have (if you want I made a dirty JS tool at http://www.tastyfish.cz/functionplot.html).
>>
the js thing you made is genuinly pretty cool. nice job! :D

that being said, here's an interesting function plot :)

>https://mathworld.wolfram.com/TuppersSelf-ReferentialFormula.html
>>

File: eo.png ( 169.69 KB , 1738x1844 , 1707001997952.png )

Image
Here's a totally underrated graph: Try
gcd(x,y)=1\gcd(x, y) = 1
on Desmos. It seems to be following the pattern of Euclid's orchard.


File: ConfusedAnimeGirl.gif ( 40.83 KB , 461x416 , 1703636547922.gif )

Image
What's the deal with local and global fields?
9 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>

File: 1be.jpg ( 53.96 KB , 640x360 , 1703842932399.jpg )

Image
>>
>>597
Neither will a calculator solve most math problems, nor will a tank solve the rest, Alberto.
>>
>>598
You miss the... ehm, deeper point.
>>

File: たそ~💊타소.png ( 486.14 KB , 1220x1037 , 1705112459065.png )

Image
>>597
>>598
>>602
What if your tank has a CAS with an integrator module?
>>
>>620
>CAS
>close air support

>integrator module
>UAV

Lol


File: AG.PNG ( 108.23 KB , 740x599 , 1650887048646.png )

Image
Talk schemes
>>
>>167
>weird pentagram thing
Why is /math/ so schizo?
>>

File: Daniell.png ( 411.77 KB , 1675x739 , 1651214487808.png )

Image
>>167
I honestly have no clue what a scheme is, err the algebraic geometry thing-wise. I do know about this scheme though


File: Bijection.png ( 32.95 KB , 1200x1200 , 1664017449826.png )

Image
>Bijection
>Isomorphism
>Equivalence Relation
It's all just the same, innit?
4 posts omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>310
>>406
Yup. Isomorphism is a bijection that preserves any structure we care about. For groups, it's the group structure, homeomorphisms preserve the continuity both ways, diffeomorphisms preserve both the continuity and the differentiability. Thus we would say "the notion of isomorphism for a structure" is diffeo/homeo/etc/morphism.
>>
>>
>>364
An isomorphism induces an equivalence between one structure with another. You can even give it a equality meaning using univalence axiom.
>>
equivalence relation is different
>>
>>310
functions are set homomorphisms
bijections are set isomorphisms


File: JohnvonNeumann.gif ( 187.66 KB , 490x639 , 1703776296430.gif )

Image
Happy Birthday von Neumann
>>
Happy Birthday to him
>>

File: 229f48a3e2e51980f404997bd1688f0a.jpg ( 1.79 MB , 3025x3912 , 1703801252663.jpg )

Image
Von Neumann helped fix the contradictions in Set Theory by rephrasing sets as classes which are members of classes.