[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

/math/ - Mathematics

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
Instructions:
  • Press the Get Captcha button to get a new captcha
  • Find the correct answer and type the key in TYPE CAPTCHA HERE
  • Press the Publish button to make a post
  • Incorrect answer to the captcha will result in an immediate ban.
File
Password (For file deletion.)
25 Dec 2021Mathchan is launched into public
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
11 / 2 / 5 / ?

File: math_curriculum.png ( 1.12 MB , 1140x4777 , 1713088252224.png )

Image
  No. 688
>>689 >>694 >>756
Please name all the books in picrel. Also review the curriculum shown. Are the books shown in the picrel enough to cover the mentioned topics. If so how long would it take.
>>
  No. 689 >>690 >>693 >>704
>>688
this is the actual mathchan curriculum: https://sheafification.com/the-fast-track/
>>
  No. 690
>>689
and how do you know
>>
  No. 693
>>689
>actual mathchan curriculum
>mechanics
Top kek
>>
  No. 694 >>695
>>688
aim high, it doesn't just have to be a dumb desk engineering job either.
the effort doesn't just stop at reading hard books, if you just go for a programming job you're being lazy, and that's not why we're here on mathchan
it's not 'follow this hobby math curriculum and do a bunch of toy analysis proofs'
which is why our list doesn't look like a typical math or CS major, because it is not courses for courses' sake
it doesn't stop there, it continues in your work - if you know theoretical physics and a base of mathematics, you could be doing literally anything
it would be lazy and shameful to stop there
you should be working on something big and important, gather experience in a different field, transform it with mathematics, start your own company
anything less is a waste
>>
  No. 695 >>696
>>694
I aim trying to aim high anon. This curriculumn looked difficult. So should I start with sheafification?
>>
  No. 696
>>695
Almost all the recommendations there are great. It recommends first getting proficient at single- and multivariable calculus before moving onto analysis but I prefer books that treat both simultaneously, like Amann and Escher's three-book analysis series.
>>
  No. 704
>>689
Even Urs Schreiber approves of the /mg/ curriculum:
https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/15070/anisomorphism/?Focus=102597#Comment_102597
>>
  No. 756
>>688
Why haven't anyone named the books yet. Just fucking read the titles. I need the names of last two books
>>
  No. 757
>>
  No. 758 >>768

File: 8.jpg ( 6.91 KB , 257x400 , 1714159727670.jpg )

Image
Last book is Topics in Transcendental Algebraic Geometry by Phillip A. Griffiths and other one is Geometric Invariant Theory by Mumford.
>>
  No. 768
>>758
Thanks Anon.
Its /thread/

Return Catalog Top Refresh
11 / 2 / 5 / ?

[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]