/math/853/ - Source

[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

Viewing source code

The following is the source code for post >>>/math/853

>>849
>>850
Thank you. I don't mind if it doesn't cover everything in depth. But you say that Amman and Escher is a good introduction to proof-based math and compare it to Zorich. I can't comment on that but I would be lying if I didn't say that I didn't have difficulties with Zorich. Are they comparable in diffculty? I have covered Courant's calculus vol. 1 beforehand and I regret it slightly.

$\mathcal{H}\textit{ome}$
$\mathcal{R}\textit{ules}$
$\mathcal{D}\textit{onate}$
$\mathcal{B}\textit{anned}$
$\mathcal{F.A.Q.}$
$\#\mathcal{C}\textit{hat}$
$\mathcal{W}\textit{iki}$