[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

/math/ - Mathematics


Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
Instructions:
  • Press the Get Captcha button to get a new captcha
  • Find the correct answer and type the key in TYPE CAPTCHA HERE
  • Press the Publish button to make a post
  • Incorrect answer to the captcha will result in an immediate ban.
File
Password (For file deletion.)

25 Dec 2021Mathchan is launched into public

18 / 3 / 16 / ?

File: asdasdas.png ( 2.99 KB , 605x152 , 1697767208017.png )

Image
What I said in the subject. It's so easy to prove. Search the problem and solve it, simple as that.
>>
>>512
>please... please search this obscure math equation online so that we could pwn you on Keizeer Soze
>>
>>512
then do it?
>>
>>512
In
n!+1=m2 n!+1=m^2
, m can be rewrite into
m˙+n \dot{m}+n
and
n!+1=(n+m˙)2 n!+1=(n+\dot{m})^2
have the same integer solution of
n!+1=(n+(n+1)2)2n!+1=(n(n1)2)2 n!+1=(n+(n+1)^2)^2 \lor n!+1=(n-(n-1)^2)^2
for
n>1 n>1
>>

File: 113546468_p0.jpg ( 589.63 KB , 4092x2893 , 1701751392190.jpg )

Image
>>512
its already proven get with the times smh ;^)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316110458_SOLVING_THE_BROCARD_PROBLEM
>>
n==4 and m==5
Proof
4!=1*2*3*4=2*3*4=6*4=24
24+1=25
sqrt(25)=5
>>
>> 548
It's obviously not a real proof. It's written in MS Word (probably) by someone with elementary knowledge on number theory. It contains so many mistakes, I don't even want to read it.
>>
>> 555
Lmfao proof to the contrary by
>wrong formatting software
and
>inadequate credentials of the author

at least referring to the mistakes would be worth something, the other two points have zero relevance to how true any of the statements are
>>

File: k-on.jpg ( 28.3 KB , 466x545 , 1713302881989.jpg )

Image
>>512
This is a very safe statement to make when you don't use "iff", I'd be willing to wager it's true and factpilled
>>
>>512
I'm a retarded dumb zoomer and I solved it so.... yeah my iq is like 120+ or sumn
>>
iq autism
>>
>>548
There's also

https://www.vixra.org/pdf/2103.0038v2.pdf
>>
>>706
I haven't read it yet but I'll rewrite the document
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316110458_SOLVING_THE_BROCARD_PROBLEM)
in
LaTeX\LaTeX
after reading it for anyone wanting to read it because...
- it is written in Word with bad formatting (like I mentioned before),
- there are some (math) typos,
- it contains unnecessary proofs of obvious facts, e.g. that any prime
p>3p > 3
is of the form
6k+16k + 1
or
6k+56k + 5
,
- it is written in a confusing way in general.
>>
n==1 and m==√2
Proof
1!=1=1=1=1
1+1=2
sqrt(2)= √2
>>
>>512
An IQ score is a measurement variable for intelligence, and is explicitly linked to the test given
This is like saying "if you can reach this tall shelf you are 6'4"
Pointlessly vague because the shelf is a godawful test
>>
critte
>>
>>835
proof by example
>>
Tesr
>>
jjjjjjjjjjjj