[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

/math/ - Mathematics


Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
Instructions:
  • Press the Get Captcha button to get a new captcha
  • Find the correct answer and type the key in TYPE CAPTCHA HERE
  • Press the Publish button to make a post
  • Incorrect answer to the captcha will result in an immediate ban.
File
Password (For file deletion.)

25 Dec 2021Mathchan is launched into public

2 / 3 / 2 / ?

File: yahtzee-chaos-1.png ( 2.41 MB , 1920x1080 , 1694700286881.png )

Image
Mathematically speaking, what is the optimal strategy for yahtzee?
>>

File: yahtzee-chaos-2.png ( 2.08 MB , 1920x1080 , 1694701115191.png )

Image
>>499

We'll be playing yahtzee in vrchat this weekend.
  1. Free
  2. Linux-compatible
  3. No GPU required

People are smart
\cap
nice
\cap
cool. 33F6YsgTX8
>>

File: a578f3d473e4b371.jpg ( 252.12 KB , 2300x2800 , 1713256037395.jpg )

Image
Depends if the result is determined as a binary (or trinary) win/loss (+draw?) or if you're playing so that every point difference is $1 or something. Way easier to calculate if it's by point difference because then there's just a single, objective EV calculation and you don't even take the opponent's strategy into account, it can't change the EV of your own move.

If playing for a win and ignoring whether it's by 1 or 100 points, you get into obscene amounts of game theory, future game simulation and even psychological exploitation of mistakes (pointless to play if you're both optimal computers, so the mistakes will be there), and the game tree fucking explodes in complexity