>>56
all of your "reasoning" crumbles with a simple "why" 

just say you have blind bleief 

>>57
>1000 years ago, no one had access to a computer;
they still had brains, very smart brains. scientists know that newtons law is wrong yet they still use it because it gives "results". computer start from assumptions, without those blind beleifs a computer can't do shit. 

>(1) All humans are mortal 
why? 

nothing is without assumption. yuo can't prove shit. nothing is objective. maybe pick up outlines of skepticism once again.