>>55
>I am 30 years old. I am just telling you about radical sckepicism, five modes of Agrippa and you're just making excuses and repeating passive agressive old shit like this. 
I already have had read Sextus Empiricus as I was a teen, thanks.

1000 years ago, no one had access to a computer; many calculation were just impossible, a lot of information has been lost because of fire, book burining and so on.
Today, we're much more further.

As I said, in my opinion, our observation are depended of our point of view. While the inferences and/or conclusions are objective.
This is possible by mathematics.

If you take:
(1) All humans are mortal
(2) Socrates is a human
(3) Ergo is Socrates mortal.

This inference is objective true, even if the premisses would be false. The logical relation is what is true, we can be wrong about empirical data.