[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

/fin/ - Finance


Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
Instructions:
  • Press the Get Captcha button to get a new captcha
  • Find the correct answer and type the key in TYPE CAPTCHA HERE
  • Press the Publish button to make a post
  • Incorrect answer to the captcha will result in an immediate ban.
File
Password (For file deletion.)

25 Dec 2021Mathchan is launched into public

8 / 2 / 8 / ?

File: sci_howtogetrich.png ( 841.78 KB , 1810x934 , 1657227344601.png )

Image
does this work
>>
no
>>
>>2
good books!
>>
>>2
The only book you need is Graham's The Intelligent Investor
>>
>>8
This!
But you should read Buffett, too.
>>
I mean only to a point... in a sense, this is a quasi-troll. at the end of the day, models are models and nothing more; black-scholes is a model and nothing more. obviously, some models are better than others, and, yes, the point of the poasting was to point out that some of the assumptions simply don't hold/ of varying mileage.

if you just want the quant job title, the poast is a complete fucking waste of time. you unironically would be better off studying linear regression and high school probability and counting competition questions at like AIME level, max, for 3 months than you would be spending whatever 9-12 months it would take to actually digest all of that material.
>>
>>2
Wall street fooled evveryone with technical jargon for the 9billionth time??
They are openly telling you -black scholes- they are going to hell for their deceit.
-right eye covered
counterintelligence laughs at your demise while satan gets more souls in its shole.

don't be fooled.
>>

File: f8c0715e6ac0e289287b46fd94b270b1.jpg ( 475.09 KB , 707x1000 , 1699643864460.jpg )

Image
>>2
I had a friend who made half a million every month on options. Read Trading in the Zone
>>
>>12
And why aren't you doing the same?