[ home ] [ math / cs / ai / phy / as / chem / bio / geo ] [ civ / aero / mech / ee / hdl / os / dev / web / app / sys / net / sec ] [ med / fin / psy / soc / his / lit / lin / phi / arch ] [ off / vg / jp / 2hu / tc / ts / adv / hr / meta / tex ] [ chat ] [ wiki ]

/phi/ - Philosophy Catalog


Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification
Instructions:
  • Press the Get Captcha button to get a new captcha
  • Find the correct answer and type the key in TYPE CAPTCHA HERE
  • Press the Publish button to make a post
  • Incorrect answer to the captcha will result in an immediate ban.
File
Password (For file deletion.)

25 Dec 2021Mathchan is launched into public

Sort by: Image size:

R: 21 / I: 1

Science is a control tool for the powers that be

I mean, nowadays most people believe and trust in science, even if it is nothing but a bunch of scribblings. You need to trust the authors of science articles, to trust the experiment can be reproduced, to trust that the experiment actually occured and is not just made up...
Sounds like kikery
R: 4 / I: 1 Philosophers have thus far only interpreted the world, the point however is to change it.
R: 7 / I: 0

Philosophy as a mandatory way of living: Search for an immediate response in help of Civilizations,

>Philosophy is the requirement for every civilization as no civilization can be created without symbols that unite its citizens to partake in the very same civilization, such that could be described as an ideology. Today we also use philosophy, although unknowingly to entertain a meaning of our life. For an example, a popular philosophy is that of authenticity which is derived from Existentialism. The problem is that philosophies are taken for granted and are not withstanding any scrutiny by it’s believers. That’s where the distinction begins. Philosophy, as it’s translation from ancient Greek is defined as love of wisdom. Following the meaning of the definition we come to the conclusion that you don’t actually love wisdom if you refuse to put everything through all forms of scrutiny as it exposes your unwillingness to find the truth and thus love of wisdom. This is the reason why we need to live in world wide philosophical societies, such that every human is able and required to fully contemplate their actions and it’s consequences. Without philosophy we cannot live in a coherent way in this construct we have as of now unless we have reached an objective truth or something absolute that can show us the perfect way to live. I label it as incoherent because in a society that doesn’t embrace philosophy instead forces us to rely on random cultural influence and biological determinism that accepts only basic emotions as truth which leads to chaotic, irrational and deadly actions. This is why we need to embrace living in a civilization and understand our duty of being philosophers. The only way to achieve this is by racially segregating people in the best climate for them. The very idea of ethnic diversity is flawed because it tries to mix people with very different features which creates unforeseen results and low trust societies. Through racial segregation people can become self-aware of their positive and negative ethnical and environmental qualities that prevent them from being philosophers, prevent unexpected behavior and strive to negate all negative qualities. For now, this sounds like the most reasonable and humane way to achieve world peace. In a world where people love wisdom and find their meaning of life by being philosophers who investigate the meaning of life and their problems while sharing it globally looks closer to virtuous living than in such that refuses to acknowledge it. Mandatory philosophical education for all ages that is focused on understanding and criticism is the most reasonable choice we can make in this age.

Easier to read here:
https://newmanleary.wordpress.com/2021/02/14/philosophy-as-a-mandatory-way-of-living-search-for-an-immediate-response-in-help-of-civilizations-world-peace-and-meaning/
R: 0 / I: 0

Idealism of Discworld

What do you think about this Approach:
https://youtu.be/vPS5Yw_YsHA

Do you think there is something to it or is it nonsense?

Must be believe in false things to become human?
R: 5 / I: 0

Theological Consequenes of AI?

Can AI help us with theological/metaphysical questions like the question of the existence of g'd or a higher reality?
>https://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/cbenzmueller/papers/C40.pdf

What do you think, fellow anons?
R: 0 / I: 0 Why is there gravity?
R: 2 / I: 0 "There is no such thing as true good or true evil it is all relative to the observer"